Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Puetz v. Puetz

Puetz v. Puetz
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 27, 2005 · Crane, Mooney, Shaw
175 S.W.3d 165; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1401; 2005 WL 2341324 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Puetz v. Puetz

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Ronald Puetz appeals the trial court’s entry of a default judgment dissolving his marriage to Sharon Puetz, the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the default judgment, and the property-division, child-custody, and child-support provisions of the judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find that Appellant’s brief preserves nothing for appeal. Rule 84.04; Rule 84.13(a). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.