Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005

Miller v. Lay

Miller v. Lay
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 22, 2005 · Ahrens, Norton, Romines
176 S.W.3d 719; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1714; 2005 WL 3109209 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Miller v. Lay

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wade J. Lay and Amanda R. Lay (“the Lays”), appeal the judgment of the trial court granting a prescriptive easement in favor of Galen Miller and Ann Miller (“the Millers”). The Lays claim the trial court *720erred in granting the easement because such a judgment was not supported by substantial evidence, and the court misdeclared and misapplied the law.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.