Liston v. State
Liston v. State
176 S.W.3d 720; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1715; 2005 WL 3109946
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Liston v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Charles Liston appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
. Liston's convictions for first-degree murder, second-degree murder and two counts of armed criminal action were affirmed in State v. Liston, 116 S.W.3d 698 (Mo.App. E.D. 2003).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.