ORDER

Defendant appeals from a judgment denying its motion to set aside a default judgment. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the *604law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).