Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Lane v. State

Lane v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 3, 2006 · Holliger, Ulrich, Ellis
180 S.W.3d 518; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 6; 2006 WL 8435 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Lane v. State

Opinion

*519 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeff Lane appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.