Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

State v. Humphrey

State v. Humphrey
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 12, 2006 · Norton, Mooney, Romines
201 S.W.3d 67; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340; 2006 WL 2597950 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Humphrey

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Donald Humphrey (Humphrey) appeals the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis (Court), after the Honorable Michael B. Calvin found him guilty of Trafficking Drugs in the Second Degree, Section 195.223 1 and Unlawful Use of Drug Paraphernalia, a misdemeanor, Section 195.233. Humphrey was sentenced, as a persistent drug offender and a persistent felony offender, to concurrent sentences of twenty years and one year, respectively.

On appeal, Humphrey argues that the Court erred and plainly erred when it allowed two police officers to testify about statements made to a 911 dispatcher by an anonymous caller who did not testify at trial. Humphrey claims this evidence was inadmissible hearsay. The Court admitted the testimony as evidence of subsequent police conduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.