Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK

Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 25, 2006 · Crane, Mooney, Shaw
190 S.W.3d 500; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 528; 2006 WL 1071981 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Russell v. MATTINGLY LUMBER AND MILLWORK

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Russell (“Employee”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) finding that Mattingly Lumber & Millwork (“Employer”) is not liable to Employee for any further medical treatment and that Employee suffered only a 5% permanent partial disability of his body. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.