Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Wilson v. HAMMERT'S IRON WORKS, INC.

Wilson v. HAMMERT'S IRON WORKS, INC.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 14, 2006 · Hoff, Ahrens, Cohen
190 S.W.3d 422; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 298; 2006 WL 618279 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wilson v. HAMMERT'S IRON WORKS, INC.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hammert’s Iron Works, Inc. (Ham-mert’s) appeals the trial court’s judgments, entered after a non-jury trial, declaring the non-compete provisions of the parties’ Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, executed July 31, 1993, (Agreement) remained in force until December 31, 2004; awarding Kenny W. Wilson specified sums of attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and costs; and denying Hammert’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of the non-compete provisions of the parties’ Agreement. 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgments are supported by substantial evidence and are not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgments pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The trial court’s denial of Wilson’s claim for vacation pay is not raised on appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.