Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 2, 2006 · Norton, Romines
190 S.W.3d 565; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 605; 2006 WL 1147659 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter, “American Family”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, finding it to be responsible for additional liability coverage. American Family raises three points on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in: faffing to make required factual findings, reforming the contract without clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, and admitting the testimony of an expert witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.