Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Aldridge v. State

Aldridge v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 25, 2006 · Hoff, Ahrens, Cohen
190 S.W.3d 520; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 532; 2006 WL 1071989 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Aldridge v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George F. Aldridge (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court was clearly erroneous because the trial court was without jurisdiction with respect to one count, and movant’s trial counsel and post-conviction counsel was ineffective.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no eiTor of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.