ORDER

Alvin Moore (“husband”), appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify maintenance. Husband argues that there was sufficient evidence of a change of circumstances so substantial and continuing to warrant a modification of maintenance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).