Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Little v. State

Little v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 2, 2006 · Baker, Dowd, Sullivan
190 S.W.3d 568; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 590; 2006 WL 1147742 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Little v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie E. Little (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 29.15. 1 Movant alleges ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to 'call Movant and another witness to testify and for failing to request MAI-CR 3d 308.14. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.