Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Little v. State

Little v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 2, 2006 · Baker, Dowd, Sullivan
190 S.W.3d 568; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 590; 2006 WL 1147742 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Little v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie E. Little (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 29.15. 1 Movant alleges ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to 'call Movant and another witness to testify and for failing to request MAI-CR 3d 308.14. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.