Faerber v. Schaeffer
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- McLaughlin v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
John Schaeffer, Konny Schaeffer, and Anchor Lumber Company (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) appeal from the judgment denying their Rule 74.06(b) motion to set aside the judgment entered against them and in favor of Linda S. Faerber, Trustee for the Harold J. Schaef-fer Lifetime Trust (collectively referred to as “Plaintiff’) in the amount of $259,669.12. Defendants contend the trial court erred in denying their Rule 74.06(b) motion to set aside the judgment because Plaintiff obtained the judgment through intrinsic fraud and the judgment was void for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.