Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

In the Interest of J.E.S.

In the Interest of J.E.S.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 22, 2006 · Norton, Mooney, Romines
198 S.W.3d 664; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1241; 2006 WL 2406241 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
In the Interest of J.E.S.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights with respect to J.E.S. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.