ORDER

Keshav S. Joshi (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition and, in the alternative, granting summary judgment in favor of Mohammed Bashiti, Et al. Appellant raises five allegations of error by the trial court.

We have reviewed all of the briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. There is no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).