Williams v. State
Williams v. State
181 S.W.3d 606; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 35; 2006 WL 44238
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
Movant, Terrón Williams, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by giving him erroneous advice regarding when he would be eligible for parole.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.