Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

State v. Shoecraft

State v. Shoecraft
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 17, 2006 · Breckenridge, Smart, Ulrich
181 S.W.3d 625; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 53; 2006 WL 88572 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Shoecraft

Opinion of the Court

Order

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie M. Shoeeraft appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.