Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Brakefield v. State

Brakefield v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 28, 2006 · Hardwick, Smart, Ulrich
184 S.W.3d 595; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 235; 2006 WL 461171 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Brakefield v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shane Brakefield appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. Mr. Brakefield sought to vacate his conviction of stealing, section 570.030, RSMo 2000, and sentence of four years imprisonment. He asserts on appeal that his guilty *596plea was not voluntarily entered because plea counsel had a conflict of interest in representing both him and his co-defendant wife.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.