Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Summers v. State

Summers v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 21, 2006 · Ellis, Lowenstein, Newton
186 S.W.3d 456; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 320; 2006 WL 693859 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Summers v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Summers appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief from his conviction on one count of second-degree trafficking. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value; *457however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.