Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Mayo v. State

Mayo v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 21, 2006 · Crane, Mooney, Shaw
186 S.W.3d 482; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 321; 2006 WL 695507 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Mayo v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Michael Mayo, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions -of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*483We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.