Mayo v. State
Mayo v. State
186 S.W.3d 482; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 321; 2006 WL 695507
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Mayo v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Michael Mayo, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions -of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.