Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Williams v. ROM Corp.

Williams v. ROM Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 14, 2006 · Ellis, Lowenstein, Newton
186 S.W.3d 827; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 154; 2006 WL 325367 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Williams v. ROM Corp.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Eugene Williams appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he had left his employment with ROM Corporation voluntarily and without good cause attributable to his work or his employer. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.