Brummall v. State
Brummall v. State
187 S.W.3d 898; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 434; 2006 WL 908591
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Brummall v. State
Opinion of the Court
Marcus L. Brummall appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Rule 29.15 motion. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.