Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Sonderman v. St. Clair

Sonderman v. St. Clair
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 28, 2006 · Crane, Mooney, Shaw
188 S.W.3d 94; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 228 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Sonderman v. St. Clair

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former husband appeals from a judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify the maintenance award in a decree of dissolution. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.