Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Holloway v. State

Holloway v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 11, 2006 · Baker, Dowd, Sullivan
193 S.W.3d 363; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 470; 2006 WL 913262 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Holloway v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terence Holloway (Movant) appeals from a judgment granting, after an eviden-tiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035,1 but denying his requested remedy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.