Nutall v. State
Nutall v. State
194 S.W.3d 925; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1040; 2006 WL 1827487
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Nutall v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Willie Nutall, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that during his plea hearing the court failed to comply with Rule 24.02.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.