Eades v. Ruprecht Building Materials Co.
Eades v. Ruprecht Building Materials Co.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Broker, Paul D. Eades and RealPro, L.L.C.,
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
. For ease and clarity, we collectively refer to appellants Paul D. Eades and RealPro, L.L.C. as "Broker.”
. Respondents/Cross-Appellants Ruprecht Building Materials Company, Breckenridge Material Company, and Lawrence J. Rhea, Jr., Trustee of the Lawrence J. Rhea Trust, have filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred on appeal, in the amount of $50,284.40. We award $12,000.00.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.