Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Ernest v. State

Ernest v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 12, 2006 · Mooney, Norton, Romines
201 S.W.3d 70; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1328; 2006 WL 2597954 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ernest v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sir Peter Ernest appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.