Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Gray v. State

Gray v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 24, 2006 · Crane, Richter, Sullivan
204 S.W.3d 328; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1573; 2006 WL 3007760 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Gray v. State

Opinion of the Court

*329 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Gray (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 postconvietion motion to vacate judgment and sentence after an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. Simmons v. State, 100 S.W.3d 143, 145 (Mo.App. E.D. 2003). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.