Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Bickley v. State

Bickley v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 31, 2006 · Dowd, Gaertner, III
204 S.W.3d 688; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1599; 2006 WL 3069503 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bickley v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Eugene Bickley (“Movant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of first degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 1996,1 and one count of armed criminal action, section 571.015. Movant was sentenced as a prior offender to concurrent sentences of life without parole and life, respectively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an *689extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1996 unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.