Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Moore v. Normandy Associates, Inc.

Moore v. Normandy Associates, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 31, 2006 · Dowd, Gaertner, III
204 S.W.3d 692; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1635; 2006 WL 3071239 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Moore v. Normandy Associates, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lee Moore (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) holding that Claimant failed to establish good cause for leaving his work and that Claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under Section 288.050, RSMo.2000. On appeal, Claimant argues the Commission erred in denying him benefits because *693he established good cause for terminating his employment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.