Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Wright v. State

Wright v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 21, 2006 · Ahrens, Baker, Hoff
206 S.W.3d 377; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1761; 2006 WL 3361124 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wright v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Wright (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*378The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.