Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

State v. Dillard

State v. Dillard
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 5, 2006 · Hardwick, Smart, Smith
207 S.W.3d 689; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1832; 2006 WL 3486824 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Dillard

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Dillard challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for driving while his license was suspended, a violation of Section 302.321, RSMo. *6902000. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a published opinion; however, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑