Briggs v. State
Briggs v. State
207 S.W.3d 725; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1887; 2006 WL 3615187
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Briggs v. State
Opinion of the Court
Order
The current appeal involves a single issue: did the motion court clearly err by denying appellant Leroy Briggs’s motion for an evidentiary hearing under Rule 24.035. Briggs claims his guilty plea entered after mistrial was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent because he feared returning to trial with an unprepared attorney and spending additional time at the county jail. Therefore, he claims, his guilty plea is subject to vacation under Rule 24.035.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.