Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006

Vester-Bates v. Ponderosa Steak House

Vester-Bates v. Ponderosa Steak House
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 26, 2006 · Mooney, Norton, Romines
209 S.W.3d 539; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1986; 2006 WL 3791254 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Vester-Bates v. Ponderosa Steak House

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Pamela Sue Vester-Bates (“Vester-Bates”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) after the Commission found that Vester-Bates was partially disabled while working for her employer, Respondent Ponderosa Steak House, and awarded her, inter alia, temporary total disability benefits of $79.67/ week.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.