BOWZER v. State
BOWZER v. State
219 S.W.3d 783; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 562; 2007 WL 1052667
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Shockley (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
James Bowzer appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.