Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007

State v. Crossland

State v. Crossland
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 16, 2007 · Richter, Ahrens, Norton
235 S.W.3d 590; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1434; 2007 WL 2990927 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Crossland

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ricardo Crossland (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of felony possession of a controlled substance (“Count I”) and one count of misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance (“Count II”), both counts in violation of section 195.202 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.