ORDER

Jeannette Maiden (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding that she denied or interfered with visitation and imposing a fine on her. Mother’s sole point on appeal alleges that the trial court erred in failing to review the original visitation schedule after a permissible non court-ordered relocation occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).