Order

Marcus E. Mitchem appeals the motion court’s denial of his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Mitchem claims that motion court erred because there was no factual basis established for his plea of guilty.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).