ORDER

Richard Travis (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. Travis was sentenced as a persistent offender to concurrent thirty-year terms.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No *567 error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).