Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007

State v. Rosenthal

State v. Rosenthal
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 25, 2007 · Richter, Ahrens, Norton
233 S.W.3d 766; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320; 2007 WL 2769439 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Rosenthal

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Rosenthal (“Defendant”) appeals the trial court judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing a credit device and the fraudulent use of a credit device. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.