State v. Rosenthal
State v. Rosenthal
233 S.W.3d 766; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320; 2007 WL 2769439
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Rosenthal
Opinion
ORDER
Kevin Rosenthal (“Defendant”) appeals the trial court judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing a credit device and the fraudulent use of a credit device. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.