Bell v. State
Bell v. State
240 S.W.3d 738; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604; 2007 WL 4105966
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Bell v. State
Opinion
*739 ORDER
Movant, Robert Bell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on five of his claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.