State v. Coody
State v. Coody
240 S.W.3d 734; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1466; 2007 WL 3070795
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Coody
Opinion
ORDER
Eugene Coody appeals from his conviction for first-degree robbery. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in: (1) admitting hearsay evidence of cell phone records; and (2) refusing to grant a mistrial when a police officer gave testimony that violated Goody’s constitutional right to remain silent. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.