State v. Hamilton
State v. Hamilton
212 S.W.3d 171; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 118; 2007 WL 148818
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Hamilton
Opinion
ORDER
James Hamilton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting Appellant of forcible rape, forcible sodomy and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err. State v. Bourrage, 175 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.