*858 ORDER

Anthony Driskell appeals from his conviction for one count of possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute. Specifically, Appellant contends that the State failed to lay a sufficient foundation for the admission of the methamphetamine at issue into evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).