State v. Driskell
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In the Interest of Z.H. (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*858 ORDER
Anthony Driskell appeals from his conviction for one count of possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute. Specifically, Appellant contends that the State failed to lay a sufficient foundation for the admission of the methamphetamine at issue into evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.