Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007

Luko v. Luko

Luko v. Luko
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 30, 2007 · Richter, Crane, Sullivan
213 S.W.3d 184; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 172; 2007 WL 220190 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Luko v. Luko

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kathy Lynn Luko (Wife) appeals from the trial court’s amended judgment of dissolution and denial of her request for a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.