Chisholm v. State
Chisholm v. State
229 S.W.3d 611; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 883; 2007 WL 1673913
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Chisholm v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Thomas W. Chisholm appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. We affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.