Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007

Marks v. Marks

Marks v. Marks
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 11, 2007 · Hoff, Sullivan
238 S.W.3d 682; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1254; 2007 WL 2593768 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Marks v. Marks

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Marks appeals from the trial court’s judgment giving him and Felicia Marks (Mother) joint legal custody of their child, yet giving Mother final decision-making authority should the parties not be able to agree on a decision. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.