Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007

Blackmon v. State

Blackmon v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 13, 2007 · Howard, Spinden, Ulrich
216 S.W.3d 260; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 422; 2007 WL 756109 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Blackmon v. State

Opinion of the Court

*261Order

PER CURIAM.

Travis Blackmon argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Rule 29.15 motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for not adequately cross-examining the alleged victim to show that she was lying about the facts and circumstances of the charged incident. The extent of cross-examination is a matter of trial strategy and Blackmon was not prejudiced. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.