Blackmon v. State
Blackmon v. State
216 S.W.3d 260; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 422; 2007 WL 756109
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Blackmon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Travis Blackmon argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Rule 29.15 motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for not adequately cross-examining the alleged victim to show that she was lying about the facts and circumstances of the charged incident. The extent of cross-examination is a matter of trial strategy and Blackmon was not prejudiced. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.