ORDER

Robert Schlup (“Schlup”) appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. Schlup claims that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing *727to object to the testimony of an expert witness, whose testimony was based, in part, upon the findings of a separate, non-testifying expert. Having fully considered the record on appeal, and finding no prejudice, this court affirms. Rule 84.16(b).