Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Antunez v. Propipe Corporation

Antunez v. Propipe Corporation
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 25, 2008 · Mooney, Shaw, Odenwald
248 S.W.3d 635; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 412; 2008 WL 821002 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Antunez v. Propipe Corporation

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jose Antunez (Claimant) appeals the temporary total disability award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the administrative law judge’s award and decision, which found that Claimant is permanently partially disabled; Propipe Corporation (Employer) is hable for past medical expenses but not future medical treatment; Employer is ha-ble for temporary total disability benefits; and the Second Injury Fund is not liable for permanent total disability benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.